|
The Neustel-Zimmer Approach should
only be utilized by inventors that intend to “license”
or “sell” their invention to an existing company. This
Approach is not designed for inventors that desire to manufacture
their inventions. Michael S. Neustel, a Registered Patent
Attorney, and Edward Zimmer, a marketing expert, developed the
Approach.
The Neustel-Zimmer Approach
attempts to maximize potential returns to an inventor intending to
license their invention while minimizing the potential risks.
While this Approach does not guarantee success for all inventors,
if followed properly it can significantly reduce the financial
risks most inventors incur. Remember . . . less than 2% of
inventions ever make money. Make sure your invention will likely
be one of those 2% before spending thousands of dollars on
patents, prototypes, and other services.
STEP #1: PRELIMINARY INVENTION
EVALUATION
The first step in the Neustel-Zimmer
Approach is to make an “objective” assessment of your
invention. If you are honest with yourself and your invention at
this step, you can possibly avoid spending money on over 50% of
your inventions that have limited value. It is assumed that you
have been maintaining detailed records of your invention as you
develop it. You should conduct two types of research during this
step: (1) market research, and (2) patent research. After
conducting your research, you should take an objective
“marketability test” to determine if you should proceed to
Step #2.
A. Market Research
Market research comprises searching
for similar products that are currently on the market or that have
been attempted to be marketed. You should conduct your market
research in (i) catalogs, (ii) the Internet, (iii) stores, and
(iv) magazines. You should also research companies that make
products similar to your invention to determine if they
manufacture products that would directly compete with your
invention or if they have a better product than your invention.
Make sure to check everything since a good percentage of
inventions can be eliminated simply by doing some solid market
research.
B. Patent Research
Patent research comprises searching
for patents that are issued for inventions similar to yours. You
can search for issued patents on the Internet or at your local
U.S. Patent Depository. There are several free search engines on
the Internet, but we suggest utilizing the IBM Patent Server at www.patents.ibm.com
which you can utilize for free. You should enter various keywords
for your invention and print out all relevant patents. Another
excellent location to search is your local U.S. Patent Depository
which has very helpful patent librarians to assist you in your
patent search. The USPTO has a complete list of Patent
Depositories at www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/ptdl/ptdlib.htm
that you can utilize.
C. Marketability Test
If a very similar product is not
located during the market and patent research, you should then
take an objective marketability test for your invention. A good
preliminary marketability test is the Wal-Mart Innovation Network
(WIN). For a fee of $175 WIN will evaluate your invention based
upon certain factors. You can contact WIN at (417) 836-5751
or visit their web site at www.wal-mart.com/win/
After you are finished conducting
your market research, patent research and marketability tests, you
have to make a choice: (i) proceed to Step #2, (ii) stop
proceeding with the invention, or (iii) place the invention on
“reserve” while you consider other inventions. Remember, less
than 50% of inventions should pass Step #1 if done correctly.
STEP #2: PATENTABILITY SEARCH &
OPINION
If your invention survives Step #1,
you should have a professional patentability search conducted at
the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO). You
should also have your Patent Attorney give you a patentability
opinion based upon the patent search results. You should expect to
spend between $400 to $800 for a good patentability search and
legal opinion.
After you receive the patentability
opinion and search results, you have to make a choice: (i) proceed
to Step #3, (ii) stop proceeding with the invention, or (iii)
place the invention on “reserve” while you consider other
inventions.
STEP #3: “SELF-DRAFT” A
PROVISIONAL PATENT APPLICATION
If your invention survives Step #2,
the next step is to draft your own Provisional Patent Application
(a.k.a. “PPA”). The PPA is not a true patent application since
it only lasts for one-year and it is not examined by the USPTO.
However, the PPA provides a suitable format for inventors to draft
their own patent application and receive up to one-year of
“patent pending” while they determine if their invention is
potentially licensable. It is highly recommended to utilize
reputable commercial materials that explain how to draft a patent
application.
It is recommended that you hire
your Patent Attorney to review your self-drafted PPA before
mailing to the USPTO. When drafting your PPA, make sure to
describe your invention in detail regarding structure,
functionality and use. Make sure to include as many detailed hand
sketches and pictures (if prototype is made) as possible to
clearly describe the components and operation of the invention.
35 U.S.C. §112, first paragraph
states that the PPA “shall contain a written description of the
invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it,
in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any
person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it
is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set
forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out
his invention.” Failure to satisfy 35 U.S.C. §112, first
paragraph can possibly result in lost patent rights. You should
consult with your Patent Attorney if you have any questions about
the legal requirements of the PPA.
STEP #4: "LICENSING"
RESEARCH
After filing your self-drafted PPA
with the USPTO, you should then begin your “licensing”
research. It is recommended that you hire a licensing agent who
specializes with your type of product (toy licensing agents,
etc.). If you are unable to locate a licensing agent who
specializes with your type of product, you can either utilize a
general licensing agent or attempt to conduct the research
yourself. Your fees for the licensing agent should be less than
$1,000 for all services rendered.
During the licensing research you
should first make a list of 5 – 20 companies that manufacture
products similar to your invention and that may be potentially
interested in licensing or buying your patent rights. You should
then try to contact these companies by telephone or mail. Without
describing your invention, you should tell the company that you
have an invention which solves a specific problem or does a
special function. You should inform them that you have “patent
pending” on this unique product. You should then ask the company
if they would potentially be “interested” in licensing or
purchasing the patent rights to your invention. If they request
more information about your invention this is a good indication
that your invention is potentially licensable. If the companies
state that they already have a product that adequately solves the
problem or that does the special function, this is an indication
that your invention is not potentially licensable.
After the 5 – 20 companies have
been contacted, your licensing agent should make an objective
assessment and recommendation as to the potential of licensing or
selling your invention. You then have to make a choice: (i)
proceed to Step #5, (ii) stop proceeding with the invention, or
(iii) place the invention on “reserve” while you consider
other inventions.
STEP #5: HIRE A PATENT ATTORNEY TO
DRAFT YOUR PATENT APPLICATION
If you feel that your invention is
potentially licensable after conducting your licensing research in
Step #4, you should then hire the Patent Attorney to draft a
complete patent application for your invention. Expect to spend
between $3,000 to $5,000 for a quality patent application from
your Patent Attorney.
STEP #6: LICENSE THE PATENT RIGHTS
After your Patent Attorney drafts
and files the complete patent application for your invention, you
then should have your licensing expert arrange to disclose your
invention to potential licensees. You should attempt to have
Confidentiality Agreements signed with these companies prior to
disclosing your invention to them. Don’t be surprised if many
companies will not sign your Confidentiality Agreement.
STEP #7: FINAL REVIEW
You should “reevaluate” your
position with regards to your invention every six-months while
completing Step #6. As an inventor, you need to objectively
determine when you should terminate all actions in promoting a
specific invention. You should base your decision upon the
reactions you receive from the companies when presented with a
full disclosure of your invention. Remember, your time is worth
something so don’t spend it attempting to market an invention
that no one wants.
Approximately every six-months you
should consider either (1) manufacturing the invention, or (2)
terminating all efforts for the invention. If you have not
received a positive reaction from industry regarding your
invention, you are strongly encouraged to consider the latter
choice to avoid creating further hardship for yourself. Do not
spend valuable time pursuing a fruitless dream.
FINAL COMMENTS
We hope that you find the Neustel-Zimmer
Approach beneficial to you during the invention process. The road
to success with your inventions requires hard work, dedication,
and most significantly “honesty” about your invention. We hope
that our Approach allows you to quickly identify the 98% of
inventions that are not licensable. Lastly, we hope that you are
able to choose the 2% of your inventions that are potentially
licensable so that you proceed further with them and become a
successful inventor!
Best wishes,
Michael S. Neustel
Edward Zimmer
www.patent-ideas.com
www.tenonline.org
Eward Zimmer and
Michael S. Neustel
met at the InventNET
Forum where they started a series of messages on
the subject of Successful Inventing. This document is a more
complete version of this subject.
Back to the InventNET
main page
|